Reporting Framework
The reporting framework of the Zero Hunger Private Sector Pledge aims to assess progress on the implementation of commitments made as part of the initiative. It was developed by independent consultants of Walk the Talk, under the supervision and guidance of the Pledge Coordinator, the Shamba Centre for Food & Climate.
As of the beginning of 2025, and since the initiative’s launch in 2021, 68 companies have successfully submitted a pledge towards aligning their investment to address UN SDG Goal 2: Zero Hunger. In their submission, these companies committed to “being able to report on resources allocation, progress, impact and challenges in the context of the agreed collaboration.”
Objective
The reporting framework is a first step in accountability and long-term impact for all participants in the Zero Hunger Private Sector Pledge (“the Pledge”). It provides a guideline and methodology on how to verify if companies are honouring their pledges through an evidenced investment. It serves as a high-level instrument which can be used to hold companies to account, and to establish a proof of concept, so that more companies join the initiative.
The reporting framework contributes to the biennial reporting exercise, which aims to publish a report with aggregated data on all pledges of over USD 1 million. For the 2025 reporting report, the ambition is to verify the following information:
Establish that the pledged investment took place
Confirm the country/region in which it was spent
Confirm the amount that was spent
This framework is also designed to guide companies in reporting on an impact indicator as part of their commitment to the Zero Hunger Pledge. It serves two key purposes:
- Reveal trends and insights – by surfacing how companies measure progress across the ten Ceres2030 areas of intervention:
- Foster a community of practice – allowing companies to see how peers measure the outcomes of private-sector investments
Timeline

Data Collection & Analysis
This section concerns all companies whose pledge totalled at least USD 1 million.
Baseline Data
Type of Financial Commitment
Ceres2030 Area of Investment
Type of Investment
Country
Implementing Organisation(s) and/or Partner(s)
Project Name
Financial Contribution
If some information was missing in the original JotForm submission, the reporting exercise provides an opportunity to update and fill in those gaps.
Reporting Data
The following data will be collected from organisations. Given the burden of reporting, the reporting framework enables flexibility on how the data is compiled as well as means of verification of the information reported.
In the submission form (Jotform), pledging companies provide information as listed in the table below. The same data points are also included in the reporting process and will be compared to information provided at the time of the submission to correct for any changes.
Data points collected at the time of the pledge submission (through Jotform) | |
Project/programme title | (Text field) |
Financial commitment | In USD or local currency. The exchange rate will be calculated based on the World Bank official exchange rates for the year(s) covered in the reporting period. |
Type of financial commitment |
|
Geographic alignment | List of priority countries as identified in the Ceres2030 report |
Thematic alignment | List of investment areas for alignment as identified in Ceres2030 |
Disbursement timeline | Period of implementation of the project/programme (e.g., 2021, 2021-2030, etc.) |
Means of verification |
|
Commitment to comply with host state laws and regulations as well as internationally agreed principles |
Additional data points collected as part of the reporting process | |
Project/programme description | (Text field) |
Amount disbursed | Amount disbursed during the reporting period. For pledges submitted during the reporting period, amount disbursed from the Jotform submission date to the end of the current reporting period. If the Pledge’s reporting cycle does not match that of the company, the amount disbursed can be calculated on a prorated basis. The amount disbursed is verified by means of verification (see below) and the amounts will be verified in the currency used for the company's pledge submission. |
Means of verification | Option to upload documents and/or insert links to relevant web pages/sites. |
Impact indicator | Identification of at least one indicator corresponding to the Ceres2030 area of the company’s commitment. |
Renewed commitment to comply with host state laws and regulations as well as internationally agreed principles | |
Additional evidence of implementation (optional; cannot substitute the accepted means of verification listed above) |
|
Impact case study (optional) | Narrative developed/verified by an external entity (not the company itself) on the outcome and impact achieved through the pledged project/programme, using the Most Significant Change (MSC) framework:
|
Impact Indicator
Given the diverse investment contexts, companies may rely on data from implementing partners, drawing from a mix of quantitative and qualitative evidence. As much as possible, indicators should be relevant and feasible and have the following qualitative attributes:
- Measurable – using reliable data sources
- Specific – clearly linked to the intervention's intended change
- Time-bound – reported against a defined time frame
- Trackable – feasible to monitor regularly over time
- Practical – realistic to collect, especially in partnership with local actors
For this reporting exercise, in the Jotform reporting form, companies will be asked to choose at least one indicator corresponding to the Ceres2030 area of their commitment: On the Farm, Empower the Excluded, or On the Move.
The table of indicators provided below is illustrative. Companies are encouraged to use it as a reference but may also report custom indicators that better reflect their investment. We will require all reporting companies to select at least one indicator from the reference list (or add in a custom indicator) but will not be collecting (nor reporting) any data this year nor expect companies to measure this indicator, as 2025 will provide the baseline year. We do not expect a company to provide an indicator for each programme at this stage.
Companies may not be able to isolate their contribution to a specific outcome. In such cases, indicators may reflect contribution or alignment rather than direct attribution. Companies are encouraged to share any supporting documentation outlining the methodology used to collect these indicators, if such a methodology has been developed.
Data Assessment & Analysis
Through the data collected, the report will analyse trends such as outlined below.
What types of interventions have taken place?
Country distribution (high priority countries vs medium and low) of interventions;
Industry/Sector distribution of companies pledging;
Pledge progress overall (% spent vs overall commitment and yearly spending (2023, 20224); and
Intentionality and engagement (i.e., assessment of the mention(s) by each company of their commitment in their public communications, review of the type and number of communications that involve the mention of the commitment, etc.).
How are pledges being implemented?
Alignment with Ceres2030 investment areas. This information was already collected via the submission. Wherever possible, the pledge progress will be analysed per investment area.
What are some best practices to assess the effectiveness of the pledge implementation?
Best/Median/Learner practice. The report will identify additional information that is reported by the Reporting Entities pertaining to the below:
Quantitative and qualitative data on progress achieved such as:
Analysis of the results against the targets / milestones set by the company in relation to their pledge;
Explanation of any significant deviations from the expected outcomes;
Description of challenges encountered (for companies unable to confirm implementation of their pledge due to conflict, difficulty accessing finance, etc.);
Indicators and metrics used to measure progress; and
Explanation from the implementing organisation(s) and/or partner(s) of any data collection challenges faced and how they were addressed.
Best Practices and Innovation / Challenges and lessons learned.
Stakeholder engagement (e.g., are the implementing organisation(s) and/or partner(s) aware that the intervention falls within the scope of the Zero Hunger Private Sector Pledge commitment?).